Difference between revisions of "It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development"
From forestDSS
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) m (Text replace - "System requirement and design,|, System requirement and design" to "") |
SeanGordon (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|Has statement=It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development; | |Has statement=It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development; | ||
|Has evidence=Sometimes researchers and developers do not have all the necessary practical experience to understand all the exigencies of the other actors involved in the system. | |Has evidence=Sometimes researchers and developers do not have all the necessary practical experience to understand all the exigencies of the other actors involved in the system. | ||
| − | + | |Has consequences=End users can suggest DSS contents and features closer to their needs. Moreover, their involvement may result in a higher acceptance and usage of the system. | |
| − | |Has consequences=End users can suggest DSS contents and features closer to their needs. Moreover, their involvement may result in a higher acceptance and usage of the system. | + | |Has recommendation for action=Ask actor categories to choose their representatives to participate in some early stage meetings and to test the first prototypes of the DSS. |
| − | |Has recommendation for action=Ask actor categories to choose their representatives to participate in some early stage meetings and to test the first prototypes of the DSS. | + | |Has domain=Stakeholder involvement in the development and use of DSS, User interface and outputs |
| − | |Has domain= | + | |Has DSS development stage=Specification |
|Has temporal scale=Long term (strategic) | |Has temporal scale=Long term (strategic) | ||
|Has spatial context=Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations | |Has spatial context=Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|Has related DSS=SIPAFIT | |Has related DSS=SIPAFIT | ||
|Has related case=Italy-A comprehensive system for forest management planning in Trentino Province | |Has related case=Italy-A comprehensive system for forest management planning in Trentino Province | ||
| − | |||
|Has working group theme=Dss development process, Participation | |Has working group theme=Dss development process, Participation | ||
|Has DSS development=It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Description of DSS development | |Has DSS development=It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Description of DSS development | ||
| Line 21: | Line 20: | ||
|Has knowledge management processes=It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Knowledge management process | |Has knowledge management processes=It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Knowledge management process | ||
|Has support for social participation=It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Support of social participation | |Has support for social participation=It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Support of social participation | ||
| + | |Has actor perspective=Developer/Architect, Facilitator, User | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 07:12, 29 July 2013
Lesson
| ID | |
|---|---|
| Has statement | It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development; |
| Has evidence | Sometimes researchers and developers do not have all the necessary practical experience to understand all the exigencies of the other actors involved in the system. |
| Has consequences | End users can suggest DSS contents and features closer to their needs. Moreover, their involvement may result in a higher acceptance and usage of the system. |
| Has recommendation for action | Ask actor categories to choose their representatives to participate in some early stage meetings and to test the first prototypes of the DSS. |
| Has domain | Stakeholder involvement in the development and use of DSS, User interface and outputs |
| Has DSS development stage | Specification |
| Has decision stage | |
| Has temporal scale | Long term (strategic) |
| Has spatial context | Spatial with no neighbourhood interrelations |
| Has spatial scale | Forest level, Stand level |
| Has objectives dimension | Multiple objectives |
| Has goods and services dimension | Market wood products, Non-market services |
| Has decision making dimension | More than one decision maker |
| Has country | Italy |
| Has reference | |
| Has related DSS | SIPAFIT |
| Has related case | Italy-A comprehensive system for forest management planning in Trentino Province |
| Has related lesson | |
| Has other relevant information | |
| Has working group theme | Dss development process, Participation |
| Has DSS development | It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Description of DSS development |
| Has decision support techniques | It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Decision support techniques |
| Has knowledge management processes | It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Knowledge management process |
| Has support for social participation | It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development.Support of social participation |
| Has actor perspective | Developer/Architect, Facilitator, User |
| Has researcher role | |
| Has user role | |
| Has developer role |
