Difference between revisions of "Question: Which DSSs were developed by large team of people"
From forestDSS
(→Question) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Question == | == Question == | ||
| − | + | * Which tools support to gather more information and interests of stakeholders? | |
| − | + | * Is these tools support democratic process, negotiation atomosphere to address the compromise solution? in order to support transparency, flexibility, time and budget and more practical tools in general? | |
| − | + | ||
== Answer == | == Answer == | ||
| + | Team of at least 5 people: | ||
| + | |||
{{#ask:[[Category:DSS]][[Has DSS development.Has development team size::>5]] | {{#ask:[[Category:DSS]][[Has DSS development.Has development team size::>5]] | ||
|format=list | |format=list | ||
| Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
== Comment == | == Comment == | ||
what about the results, why are they relevant ... | what about the results, why are they relevant ... | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category: Umea 2013 Question]] | ||
Latest revision as of 18:08, 25 April 2013
Question
- Which tools support to gather more information and interests of stakeholders?
- Is these tools support democratic process, negotiation atomosphere to address the compromise solution? in order to support transparency, flexibility, time and budget and more practical tools in general?
Answer
Team of at least 5 people:
AFFOREST-sDSS, CONES, EFIMOD, EMDS, ETÇAP, EcologicalSiteClassification, LEaRNForME, PYL, ProgettoBosco, SIPAFIT, ToSIA
Comment
what about the results, why are they relevant ...
